You Are Not Having the Same Fight
- Wajdi Akef Fakhoury, LMFT

- Aug 1
- 6 min read
Updated: 22 hours ago
Why neurodiverse couples can love each other deeply --and still keep missing the signal
Wajdi Akef Fakhoury, LMFT

One partner says: “Why do I have to keep asking?”
The other says: “How was I supposed to know?”
One hears silence and thinks: I do not matter enough for you to respond.
The other hears urgency and thinks: I am already failing, and now I have to answer before I can think.
By the time many neurodiverse couples arrive in therapy, the fight is no longer about the dishes, the missed text, sex, bedtime, work, or the unfinished task.
It is about what those moments have come to mean.
You do not notice me.
You are never satisfied.
You do not care.
You are always criticizing me.
I cannot rely on you.
I can never get it right.
Both partners may be communicating constantly.
They are simply no longer receiving the same message.
Your relationship may not have a communication shortage.
It may have a translation failure.
THE SAME EVENT CAN BECOME TWO DIFFERENT INJURIES
A partner forgets an agreement.
One person experiences executive-functioning difficulty.
The other experiences abandonment.
A partner needs space during conflict.
One person is trying to recover enough language to respond accurately.
The other experiences withdrawal at the moment connection matters most.
A partner asks a question repeatedly.
One person is trying to create certainty.
The other experiences interrogation.
A partner offers a solution.
One person is attempting to show care.
The other wanted emotional recognition and experiences the solution as dismissal.
The event is shared.
The meaning is not.
Most couples do not become deeply injured by one misunderstanding.
They become injured by the meaning repeated misunderstandings acquire.
Eventually, each partner begins reacting not only to what is happening now, but to every earlier moment that felt the same.
THE RELATIONSHIP DEVELOPS ITS OWN NERVOUS SYSTEM
Neurodivergence does not remain inside one partner.
It enters the timing of the relationship.
It enters how responsibilities are remembered, how affection is initiated, how transitions are managed, how conflict escalates, and how quickly each person can recover.
Then the couple develops a pattern.
One partner pursues because distance feels dangerous.
The other withdraws because pressure makes thinking and language less accessible.
The withdrawal intensifies the pursuit.
The pursuit intensifies the withdrawal.
Both partners eventually believe the other is deliberately choosing the behavior that causes the most pain.
Often, neither person is choosing freely.
They are protecting themselves from opposite sides of the same cycle.
INTENT AND IMPACT MUST BOTH SURVIVE THE CONVERSATION
Neurodivergence may explain why something happened.
It does not erase the impact.
Forgetting may not mean indifference.
It can still leave the other partner carrying the responsibility alone.
Shutdown may not mean punishment.
It can still feel terrifying to the person left without a response.
Direct language may be necessary.
It can still be delivered harshly.
Reassurance may be a genuine need.
It can still become impossible to provide when it must happen immediately and repeatedly.
The relationship fails when only one truth is allowed.
If intent is the only truth, the injured partner disappears.
If impact is the only truth, neurodevelopmental reality disappears.
Good couples therapy protects both.
Explanation is not absolution.
Impact is not proof of intent.
RECIPROCAL INTIMACY IS MORE THAN LOVING EACH OTHER
Many neurodiverse couples love each other deeply and still feel profoundly lonely.
That is because intimacy requires more than love.
It requires the repeated experience of reaching and being reached.
Noticing and being noticed.
Responding and being responded to.
Leaving and reliably returning.
But reciprocity can become difficult when one or both partners are managing overload, emotional dysregulation, sensory strain, executive-functioning demands, or a substantial need for recovery.
One partner may be intensely absorbed in work because work provides structure, competence, stimulation, and a way to provide for the family.
Their internal message is:
I am doing this for us.
The partner waiting downstairs receives:
You are never available to me.
Intent says devotion.
Impact says rejection.
Neither experience cancels the other.
The relationship must make room for focus, solitude, and recovery without allowing chronic unavailability to become its emotional architecture.
“WE NEED TO TALK” MAY ARRIVE AT THE WORST POSSIBLE TIME
One partner may process emotion by talking.
The conversation is how they discover what they think.
The other may need to understand internally before speaking accurately.
Pressure for an immediate response may produce silence, guessing, defensiveness, or agreement without comprehension.
Then the first partner pushes harder because the response feels absent.
The second becomes less able to respond because the pressure is increasing.
This is why “never go to bed angry” can be disastrous advice for some couples.
At midnight, one person may experience delay as abandonment.
The other may be exhausted, overloaded, and neurologically unavailable for repair.
The alternative is not avoidance.
It is a reliable return.
A useful pause answers:
Are we pausing or ending this conversation?
When exactly will we return?
Who will initiate?
What reassurance is needed before we separate?
What will help both of us become more receptive?
A pause without return feels like abandonment.
A demand for immediate resolution can feel like captivity.
The couple needs a structure that protects both people.
THE INVISIBLE WORK MUST BECOME VISIBLE
In many neurodiverse relationships, one partner gradually becomes the scheduler, reminder system, anticipator, emotional interpreter, and manager of unfinished tasks.
At first, helping feels like love.
Then help becomes responsibility.
Responsibility becomes supervision.
Supervision becomes resentment.
The other partner feels corrected, monitored, and treated as another dependent person in the household.
Both become trapped in roles neither of them consciously chose.
One feels abandoned with the mental load.
Love cannot resolve a workload that has never been named.
The couple must make it visible:
What responsibilities actually exist?
Who owns each one?
What needs to be written, automated, scheduled, or externally supported?
Where has helping become overfunctioning?
Where has independence become abandonment?
Equality does not require identical contributions.
It requires an agreement both partners can see, understand, and genuinely consent to.
A DIAGNOSIS CAN EXPLAIN THE PAST WITHOUT REPAIRING IT
A late diagnosis can feel like someone finally turning on the lights.
Patterns once described as laziness, coldness, selfishness, instability, or lack of commitment may suddenly make more sense.
But understanding is not the same as repair.
The newly diagnosed partner may be reinterpreting an entire life.
The other partner may feel relief, hope, grief, anger, or resentment that the explanation arrived after years of injury.
The diagnosis may explain the pattern.
It does not automatically restore trust.
Sometimes a couple has missed each other through too many small doorways.
Sometimes there is too much injury for information alone to reverse.
But when enough trust remains, diagnosis can become more than a defense or explanation.
It can become the beginning of a more accurate relationship.
NEITHER PARTNER SHOULD BECOME THE PROBLEM
The neurodivergent partner should not become the identified patient of the relationship.
The other partner should not be reduced to someone who simply needs more education or tolerance.
Both people bring needs, histories, assumptions, injuries, and protective strategies into the room.
Both may have adapted in ways that now hurt the relationship.
The cycle belongs to the couple.
So does the responsibility for changing it.
Neurodivergent-responsive couples therapy does not teach one partner to appear more conventional.
It does not ask the other to accept every painful pattern as inevitable.
It asks better questions:
What did each person believe was happening?
What was stated directly, and what was expected to be inferred?
When does language become less available?
How does each partner recognize love, effort, apology, and repair?
Which responsibilities are unclear?
What support increases access without creating dependency?
What accountability is needed without turning difficulty into moral failure?
The therapist should not become the couple’s permanent translator.
The work is to help the couple build a translation system of their own.
THE GOAL IS NOT PERFECT UNDERSTANDING
No partner will understand everything automatically.
No amount of love creates mind-reading.
The goal is not to eliminate difference.
It is to make difference less dangerous.
To replace assumption with clarification.
Accusation with description.
Endless pursuit with reliable return.
Invisible labor with explicit agreements.
Forced immediacy with better timing.
Character judgment with a more accurate explanation.
A neurodiverse relationship does not need one person to become less neurodivergent.
It does not need the other to stop having needs.
It needs a way for both people to remain present without requiring either of them to disappear.
You may not need more love.
You may need a relationship in which love is finally delivered in a form both people can recognize.
ABOUT COUPLES THERAPY AT SAMAR NEURODIVERGENT THERAPY CENTER
Samar Neurodivergent Therapy Center provides structured, neurodivergent-responsive couples and relationship therapy.
The work may address communication differences, emotional regulation, sensory and processing needs, executive functioning, conflict cycles, division of responsibility, intimacy, post-diagnosis adjustment, and repair—without reducing the relationship to one partner’s diagnosis.
Services are available in person in Pasadena, CA and by secure telehealth throughout California.



.png)